🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good first step," said a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and fit for minors," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the state level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to follow this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this international conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.